State v. Hummel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court properly refused to permit defendant charged with carnal abuse to show that the complainants had previously fabricated complaints of serious matters or had previously engaged in misconduct or disorderly conduct
• evidence admissible under Evid.R. 55 excluded as hearsay
• evidence admissible under Evid.R. 55 excluded as hearsay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ingenito
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-07-27· cited 171×
• State v. Hutchins
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-05-24· cited 104×
• State v. Cusick
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1987-07-23· cited 78×
• State v. Bass
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1987-09-22· cited 34×
• State v. M.L.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-10-16· cited 32×
• State v. Slattery
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-03-15· cited 23×
• State v. D.R.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-12-16· cited 21×
• State v. Ryan
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1978-03-14· cited 19×
• State v. Burnett
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1984-10-24· cited 16×
• State v. Stevens
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-02-19· cited 14×
• State v. Sease
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-12-08· cited 8×
• State v. DR
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-12-16· cited 8×
• State v. Bethune
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-05-01· cited 6×
• State v. ML
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-10-16

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Hummel
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-01-29· cited 42×