New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2/14/1984
State v. Conway
Citations
- 472 A.2d 588
- 193 N.J. Super. 133
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[w]hen a jury requests clarification” during its deliberations, “the trial judge is obligated to clear the confusion”
- stating that motions for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence are typically \not favored and should be granted with caution by a trial court since it disrupts the judicial process\ (citing State v. Haines, 20 N.J. 438, 443 (1956))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Matthews, J.H. Coleman and Gaulkin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. SavageSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2002-06-20· cited 164×
- State v. EngelNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-07-02· cited 137×
- State v. RussoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-07-18· cited 128×
- State of New Jersey v. Rodney ArmourNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2016-07-19· cited 75×
- State v. HenriesNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-12-23· cited 41×
- State v. TaccettaNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-05-23· cited 40×
- Matter of ConwaySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-06-10· cited 39×
- Grecco v. O'LoneD. New Jersey· 1987-05-27· cited 34×
- State v. ScherNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1994-12-23· cited 31×
- Menna v. Johns-Manville Corp.D. New Jersey· 1984-04-30· cited 29×
- Matter of RigolosiSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-06-10· cited 24×
- State v. RandolphNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2015-08-07· cited 22×
- State v. RoldanNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1998-07-30· cited 21×
- State v. WilsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-07-22· cited 18×
- State v. UrcinoliNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-06-02· cited 18×
- State v. CarswellNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-07-25· cited 18×
- State v. GrahamNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1995-11-14· cited 16×
- State v. R.T.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2009-12-16· cited 15×
- Miller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1998-03-27· cited 14×
- Roland v. Brunswick Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1987-02-20· cited 14×
Cites
56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court· 1974-07-24· cited 4,095×
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court· 1970-12-15· cited 1,926×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1964-04-20· cited 1,662×
- Dolson v. AnastasiaSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1969-11-17· cited 601×
- State v. ReyesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1967-12-04· cited 447×
- State v. HurdSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-07-14· cited 277×
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1982-05-12· cited 236×
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1971-11-08· cited 190×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-03-03· cited 185×
- State v. OrecchioSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1954-06-28· cited 180×
- State v. WilbelySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1973-07-12· cited 178×
- United States v. Sterling Hamilton, Scotty Hamilton, Anthony Bryan Salisbury and Earl Wayne WrightSixth Circuit· 1983-01-10· cited 157×
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1965-11-08· cited 134×
- State v. WhitakerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1979-05-08· cited 127×
- State v. CavalloSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1982-02-17· cited 104×
- State v. CarySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1967-06-06· cited 98×
- Hager v. WeberSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1951-05-21· cited 97×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.