State v. Human Rights Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding magistrate's finding that use of \general sexual terms\ such as \fuck\ and \motherfucker\ as expletives \did not amount to sexual conduct\ in sexual harassment case
• upholding magistrate’s finding that use of “general sexual terms” such as “fuck” and “motherfucker” as expletives “did not amount to sexual conduct” in sexual harassment ease
• offensive terms and remarks describing sexual acts, bodily functions, and parts of the female anatomy constituted \conduct of a sexual nature\
• offensive terms and remarks describing sexual acts, bodily functions, and parts of the female anatomy constituted “conduct of a sexual nature”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).