State v. Hudson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court inquiring into claim of extraneous prejudicial information under Rule 606(b) “properly refused to consider statements by the jurors as to what may have influenced their deliberations”
• rejecting an inference of extraneous influence as insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Leo Paul Pratt II
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2015-08-14· cited 17×
• State v. Abdi
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2012-01-26· cited 8×
• State v. Rooney
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2001-11-07· cited 1×
• Newman v. Hobbs
  Vermont Superior Court· 2004-01-02
• Williams v. State of Vermont
  Vermont Superior Court· 2017-07-28

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Pelican
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-07-23· cited 75×
• State v. Bacon
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1995-02-17· cited 74×
• State v. Wright
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-11-17· cited 38×
• State v. Searles
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-01-15· cited 37×
• Palmigiano v. State
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1978-07-03· cited 34×
• Bellows Falls Village Corp. v. State Highway Board
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1963-04-09· cited 29×
• State v. Elkins
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-08-03· cited 16×
• State v. Brunell
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1992-05-22· cited 15×
• State v. Bogie
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1966-02-01· cited 14×
• State v. Joy
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-04-29· cited 9×
• State v. Bushey
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1979-04-03· cited 4×
• State v. James
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1986-12-10· cited 4×