Skip to main content
· 8/14/2015

State v. Leo Paul Pratt II

Citations

  • 2015 VT 89
  • 200 Vt. 64
  • 128 A.3d 883
  • 2015 Vt. LEXIS 84

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • surveying multiple cases involving the use of computer software and other technological devices for the extraction of data
  • affirming admission of Cellebrite extraction evidence in 2013

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reiber, Dooley, Skoglund, Robinson, Eaton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.