State v. Hudson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We hold that the state may produce additional evidence of defendant’s parole status at a resentencing involving § 13-604.02(A) without violating double jeopardy guarantees.”
• “We hold that the state may produce additional evidence of defendant’s parole status at a resentencing involving § 13-604.02(A) without violating double jeopardy guarantees.”
• double jeopardy does not preclude new enhancement evidence under A.R.S. § 13-604.02 at resentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Richards
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-08-07· cited 22×
• State v. Martinez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-04-14· cited 7×
• State v. Osborn
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-02-24· cited 5×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anders v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
• State v. Leon
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1969-03-14· cited 1,311×
• State v. LaGrand
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1987-01-30· cited 95×
• State v. Williams
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-04-17· cited 57×
• State v. Hurley
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1987-07-02· cited 42×
• State v. Turner
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-05-09· cited 34×
• State v. Rumsey
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-04-14· cited 31×
• State v. Sowards
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-07-29· cited 13×
• Sheppard v. State Ex Rel. Eyman
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-09-08· cited 4×
• Meredith v. Raines
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-01-07· cited 3×