Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/17/2025
State v. Hudson
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5185
Syllabus
Individual convicted of obstructing official business and disorderly conduct failed to demonstrate prejudice from the delay in appointing him appellate counsel or from the municipal court's failure to comply with Crim.R. 10 at his arraignment. Municipal court had subject-matter jurisdiction to convict him of disorderly conduct.
Judges: M. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-04-29· cited 3,330×
- United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court· 2006-06-26· cited 1,863×
- State v. MbodjiOhio Supreme Court· 2011-06-21· cited 107×
- Stern v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court· 1968-04-30· cited 71×
- State v. BonnellOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-24· cited 66×
- State v. WalstonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-06· cited 6×
- State v. ColquittOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-12· cited 5×
- State v. BunchOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.