Skip to main content

State v. Bunch

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 1602

Syllabus

Appellant, in addition to incorrectly asserting that Crim.R. 5(A) applied to arraignments, could not any challenge the trial court's supposed failure to comply with the requirements of Crim.R. 10(C) at his arraignment hearing because Crim.R. 10(C) does not apply when a defendant is represented by counsel.

Judges: S. Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.