State v. Huber

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 1862

Syllabus

In a bench trial, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting surveillance video from the pawn shop where appellant and her accomplice sold stolen eyeglass frames because the investigating officer authenticated the videotape by testifying the videotape produced at trial was the same videotape he viewed at the pawn shop during his investigation, and the videotape accurately portrayed the events that occurred at the pawn shop on the night in question. Appellant's conviction of receiving stolen property was supported by sufficient evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed.