State v. Allen

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 4727

Syllabus

The evidence is sufficient to support the jury's verdict of guilty for rape, sexual battery, and gross sexual imposition of the three victims; therefore, the trial court did not err in denying appellant's Crim.R. 29 motion for acquittal. Further, the verdict was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Appellant did not identify any conflicting evidence that would support his argument that the jury clearly lost its way and created such a miscarriage of justice that the convictions must be reversed and a new trial ordered. Judgment affirmed.