State v. Hoyle
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 899
Syllabus
Appellant's convictions of cruelty to a companion animal in violation of R.C. 2941.145(A) and having weapons under disability in violation of R.C. 2923.13 are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Neither the jury nor the trial court lost its way in finding appellant guilty of the charges based on the evidence presented at trial. Merely because the respective finders of fact chose to find the state's witnesses credible does not render appellant's convictions against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Beatty Blunt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court· 1984-04-18· cited 4,990×
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 3,796×
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 2007-05-23· cited 1,198×
- State v. GullickOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-04-17· cited 36×
- State v. HuberOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-14· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.