State v. Howland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Appellant cannot walk out during the trial, inform his counsel that he will not be present, and then claim that his constitutional right to be present has been violated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Stotts
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 63×
• State v. Melendez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-02-21· cited 3×
• State v. Edwards
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-11-29
• State of Arizona v. Steven Ricardo Vallejo
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2025-06-18

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Griswold v. Connecticut
  Supreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,329×
• Leyra v. Denno
  Supreme Court· 1954-06-01· cited 448×
• In Re Lifschutz
  California Supreme Court· 1970-04-15· cited 245×
• State v. Schantz
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1965-06-23· cited 126×
• State v. Roberti
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-05-04· cited 81×
• State v. McVay
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-12-04· cited 71×
• State v. Steelman
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1978-09-13· cited 62×
• State v. Vangen
  Washington Supreme Court· 1967-11-16· cited 38×
• Allred v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1976-08-12· cited 32×
• State v. Evans
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-03-20· cited 29×
• State v. O'DELL
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1972-01-28· cited 19×
• State v. Armenta
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-11-06· cited 17×