Court of Appeals of Oregon· 8/14/2002
State v. Howell
Citations
- 183 Or. App. 360
- 51 P.3d 706
- 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1271
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a defendant exercised “control” over a vehicle because he intended to deprive the rightful owner of possession as exhibited by breaking into the car and attempting to steal the title, spare keys, a broken garage door opener, and a map from the glove box
- affirming UUV conviction under ORS 164.135(l)(a) where the defendant was found sleeping in a car parked in a residential garage with the “title to the car in his pocket and spare keys to the car in his lap”
- affirming UUV conviction under ORS 164.135(1)(a
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brewer, Collins, Landau, Tempore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. KingOregon Supreme Court· 1989-01-31· cited 170×
- State v. CervantesOregon Supreme Court· 1994-05-26· cited 131×
- People v. McCalebNew York Court of Appeals· 1969-11-26· cited 77×
- State v. RaineyOregon Supreme Court· 1985-01-08· cited 73×
- State v. BeasonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-10-11· cited 21×
- State v. MacOmberOregon Supreme Court· 1974-06-13· cited 16×
- State v. DouthittCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-04-03· cited 14×
- State v. MacOmberCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-12-24· cited 8×
- State v. CervantesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-09-07· cited 6×
- State v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-04-16· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.