State v. Howard Jones(073827)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “extrinsic evidence of guilt plays no role in assessing whether a suggestive eyewitness identification was nonetheless inherently reliable”
• noting statements by police identifying witness as a suspect can bear on suggestiveness of a showup
• declining to reverse a conviction, despite the erroneous admission of lay opinion, where there was overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt, which included his admission of wrongdoing and a videotape of the narcotics exchange
• \[E]xtrinsic evidence of guilt plays no role in assessing whether a suggestive eyewitness identification was nonetheless inherently reliable.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).