State v. Hoskins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “all references to polygraph tests, absent stipulation, are inadmissible for any purpose in Arizona”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Moody
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2004-08-09· cited 424×
• State v. Sansing
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2003-09-24· cited 54×
• Robert Poyson v. Charles Ryan
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-03-22· cited 41×
• State of Arizona v. Shawn Patrick Lynch
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2015-09-10· cited 35×
• State v. Speers
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-09-28· cited 30×
• State v. Armstrong
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2004-07-15· cited 19×
• Michael Murdaugh v. Charles Ryan
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-07-26· cited 18×
• State v. Rutledge
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2003-09-16· cited 17×
• State of Arizona v. William Peter Moran
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-07-31· cited 13×
• State v. Burdick
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-01-14· cited 11×
• In Re Pima County Mental Health Cause No. A20020026
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-06-23· cited 5×
• State v. Whitley
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-02-24· cited 3×
• Robert Poyson v. Charles Ryan
  Ninth Circuit· 2018-01-12

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ring v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
• State v. Ring
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2003-04-03· cited 325×
• State v. Hoskins
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2000-12-29· cited 180×
• State v. Hyde
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1996-07-09· cited 167×
• State v. Ring
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2001-06-20· cited 116×
• State v. Medina
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1999-03-04· cited 98×