State v. Horton
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5103
Syllabus
Motion to Suppress; Consent to Search; Ineffective Assistance of Counsel; Custodial Interrogation. The trial court did not err in denying defendant-appellant's motion to suppress the drugs found during the search of his home because his consent to the search was freely and voluntarily given. Trial counsel was not ineffective in failing to timely file a motion to suppress on Miranda grounds because defendant-appellant did not show such a motion had a reasonable probability of success. Defendant-appellant's drug possession conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 3,796×
- State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court· 2000-01-05· cited 1,280×
- State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court· 2011-12-20· cited 787×
- State v. MasonOhio Supreme Court· 1998-06-17· cited 600×
- State v. MessengerOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-21· cited 321×
- State v. HallerOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-13· cited 264×
- State v. NieldsOhio Supreme Court· 2001-08-29· cited 262×
- State v. PoseyOhio Supreme Court· 1988-12-30· cited 168×
- State v. DunnOhio Supreme Court· 2012-03-15· cited 87×
- Cleveland v. Oles (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-07-19· cited 54×
- State v. CartlidgeOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-06· cited 22×
- State v. RadabaughOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-02· cited 14×
- State v. SiengOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-18· cited 9×
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-30· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.