State v. Holt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• State must prove taking was accomplished through defendant’s false statement or representation, express or implied, pertaining to a present or past fact to support conviction under K.S.A. 21-3421
• State must prove taking was accomplished through defendant's false statement or representation, express or implied, pertaining to a present or past fact to support conviction under K.S.A. 21-3421

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Robinson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2015-11-06· cited 152×
• State v. Ware
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1980-07-09· cited 57×
• State v. Garcia
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1983-06-10· cited 54×
• People v. Fisher
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1993-06-30· cited 39×
• State v. Hanna
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1989-02-17· cited 29×
• State v. Egbert
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1980-03-01· cited 24×
• State v. Dalton
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1980-09-16· cited 24×
• State v. Murrell
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1978-10-28· cited 17×
• State v. Higgenbotham
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1998-04-17· cited 16×
• State v. Tronchin
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-03-22· cited 10×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1957-06-08· cited 109×
• State v. Colbert
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1976-12-11· cited 30×
• State v. Donnelson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1976-05-08· cited 15×
• State v. Adair
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1974-06-15· cited 7×
• State v. Freeman
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1975-04-05· cited 7×