Supreme Court of Kansas· 6/8/1957

State v. Brown

Citations

312 P.2d 832
181 Kan. 375
1957 Kan. LEXIS 378

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that rape, even though supplying the essential element of bodily harm required for first-degree kidnapping, was a separate and distinct offense, and the offenses were not multiplicitous
holding that rape, even diough supplying die essential element of bodily harm required for first-degree kidnapping, was a separate and distinct offense, and the offenses were not multiplicitous
holding that rape, even though supplying the essential element of bodily harm required for first-degree kidnapping, was a separate and distinct offense, and the offenses were not multiplicitous
recognizing rape was unnecessary, violent act not part of kidnapping and thus proved bodily harm
recognizing rape was unnecessary, violent act not part of kidnapping and thus proved bodily harm
recognizing rape was unnecessary, violent act not part of kidnapping and thus proved bodily harm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Wertz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.