Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/25/2023
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 2979
Syllabus
Duhart. Johnson's motion to suppress was properly denied. Evidence adduced at the suppression hearing supports the conclusion that Archer possessed at least reasonable suspicion that that the vehicle was driven in violation of R.C. 4511.34.
Judges: Duhart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- City of Dayton v. EricksonOhio Supreme Court· 1996-07-03· cited 850×
- Heien v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 2014-12-15· cited 619×
- State v. MaysOhio Supreme Court· 2008-09-16· cited 383×
- State v. OrrOhio Supreme Court· 2001-05-02· cited 93×
- State v. KellyOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-08-02· cited 19×
- State v. HolmesOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-24· cited 11×
- State v. MartoranaOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-03· cited 11×
- State v. McDonaldOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-16· cited 6×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-13· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.