State v. Jones
Citations
- 151 N.E.3d 1059
- 2020 Ohio 281
Syllabus
AGGRAVATED MURDER – EVIDENCE – SUFFICIENCY – SELF-DEFENSE – CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL – CUMULATIVE ERROR: Defendant's conviction for aggravated murder was not supported by sufficient evidence of \prior calculation and design\ where defendant did not engage in a studied consideration of the method, means, or location of the killing: defendant did not choose the time or location of the shooting, there is no evidence that defendant knew the victim would be at the location of the shooting, and the act was an almost instantaneous eruption of events. [But see DISSENT: The state presented sufficient evidence of \prior calculation and design\ where, construing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, the evidence supported the conclusion that defendant engaged in a pattern of activity that involved ascertaining the whereabouts of the victim, strategically parking his vehicle, exiting from it with gun in hand, and firing multiple times at the victim.] The defense did not open the door for, and the trial court erred in admitting into evidence, other-weapons photographs where defense counsel made only a brief implication during cross-examination and no unfair prejudice to the state resulted from defense counsel's question. Where defendant pursued a theory of self-defense in a murder trial, the trial court's exclusion of evidence as to defendant's state of mind at the time of the offense violated defendant's right to present a complete defense: (1) the trial court erred in excluding as hearsay defendant's testimony that his father and aunt told him about an incident where the victim made threatening statements against defendant while possessing a gun and (2) the trial court erred in arbitrarily excluding social media posts by the victim pertaining to violence and guns where it allowed the state to capitalize on the improper ruling in its closing argument. [But see DISSENT: While the trial court erred in admitting the photo of the guns and ammunition, precl
Judges: Crouse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-23· cited 82×
- State v. GatewoodOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-22· cited 18×
- State v. HoustonOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-11-25· cited 16×
- State v. EnglishOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-30· cited 14×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-08· cited 11×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-08· cited 10×
- State v. HolmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-05-15· cited 1×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-06-09· cited 2,651×
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1987-06-22· cited 2,329×
- State v. SageOhio Supreme Court· 1987-07-08· cited 1,978×
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1988-03-28· cited 1,952×
- Holmes v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 2006-05-01· cited 1,409×
- Montana v. EgelhoffSupreme Court· 1996-06-13· cited 816×
- State v. DeMarcoOhio Supreme Court· 1987-07-08· cited 679×
- State v. RobbinsOhio Supreme Court· 1979-05-02· cited 484×
- State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court· 1997-03-19· cited 474×
- Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-11-24· cited 277×
- State v. CottonOhio Supreme Court· 1978-10-04· cited 259×
- State v. Walker (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-23· cited 255×
- State v. MartinOhio Supreme Court· 1986-01-15· cited 221×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.