State v. Hurd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the court committed \reversible error by refusing defense counsel's request to question the juror as to whether he heard all of the charge\
• determining the request to remove a juror or \bring him in and question him\ was sufficient to require the trial court to determine whether the juror was unqualified
• “[I]t is incumbent upon the trial court to conduct a probing and tactful inquiry to determine whether a sworn juror is unqualified . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Arturo D.
  California Supreme Court· 2002-01-24· cited 69×
• State v. Marquina
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2018-11-23· cited 18×
• State v. Bell
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-06-04· cited 16×
• Diaz v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-11-02· cited 14×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-12-06· cited 10×
• Mason v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1998-04-17· cited 9×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tanner v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-22· cited 915×
• State v. Schumpert
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-08-23· cited 136×
• Abofreka v. Alston Tobacco Co.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-03-11· cited 38×
• State v. Holland
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1973-11-28· cited 32×
• People v. Valerio
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1988-06-06· cited 17×
• State v. Reevey
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1978-05-09· cited 16×
• State v. Smicklevich
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-04-18· cited 6×
• State v. Stone
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-11-03· cited 5×