Supreme Court of Iowa· 6/18/1980

State v. Holderness

Citations

293 N.W.2d 226
1980 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 874

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating a witness “who describes the photographic process employed and testifies it produces accurate pictures” can authenticate photographic evidence
to admit a photograph into evidence, the picture must (1) be relevant to the controversy and (2) fairly represent what it shows
State as proponent of photograph had burden to establish foundational elements for its admission
motion need not be renewed at close of all evidence to preserve appeal
“[W]e will no longer have cases in which a defendant fails on appeal because he overlooked renewing his motion at the end of all the evidence. Thus he may rely on his unrenewed motion in posttrial motions and on appeal.”
photograph of defendant holding stolen objects allowed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Uhlenhopp, Rees, Uhlen-Hopp, McCormick, McGiverin, Larson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.