State v. James

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing the “guilty knowledge,” or mens rea, required to violate section 714.1(6) as “obtaining . . . something of value through the use of a check which the perpetrator knows is worthless” (quoting State v. Smith, 300 N.W.2d 90, 92–93 (Iowa 1981))
• victim’s statements in response to questioning by police thirty minutes after attack admissible as excited utterance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hogrefe
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1996-11-20· cited 51×
• State v. Stange
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-08-15· cited 37×
• City of Cedar Falls v. Flett
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1983-02-16· cited 23×
• State v. McFadden
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1991-03-20· cited 2×
• State of Iowa v. Kamie Jo Schiebout
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2020-06-05

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Freeman
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1978-06-28· cited 32×
• State v. Jackson
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1960-03-08· cited 29×
• State v. Tomlinson
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1976-06-30· cited 27×
• State v. Holderness
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1980-06-18· cited 27×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1981-01-14· cited 18×
• State v. Mullin
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1975-01-22· cited 13×
• State v. TeBockhorst
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1981-05-13· cited 8×