Skip to main content

Cooper v. State

Citations

  • 32 A.3d 988
  • 2011 WL 6039613

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that delay of one year and six weeks between arrest and trial required full Barker analysis
  • “The Court also considers whether the defendant acted inconsistently with his assertion of the speedy trial right.”
  • “To invoke this exception, the defendant must show, beyond mere speculation, that the confidential informant may be able to give testimony that would materially aid the defense.”
  • informant who set up the deal came to the prearranged location but only pointed out the defendant as he ducked inside the undercover car and therefore was not a witness to the arrest. Disclosure not mandated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.