State v. Blackburn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that videotaped interview between child and investigator was admissible
• hearsay statements to SRS caseworker and police officer were taken for purposes of investigation, not for preparation of legal action
• interview with police after four preliminary SRS interviews still within “the investigatory stage”
• “Where the child’s testimony against a potential defendant is clear and consistent and further interviews simply repeat or preserve what has already been said, the only reasonable view may be that preparing legal proceedings was the primary focus.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Livingston
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1995-09-05· cited 74×
• State v. LaBounty
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1998-04-17· cited 27×
• State v. Fisher
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1997-03-21· cited 24×
• State v. Lawton
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1995-09-01· cited 18×
• State v. Spooner
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2010-08-13· cited 16×
• State v. Tester
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2006-03-08· cited 14×
• State v. Willis
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2006-11-22· cited 11×
• In re C.K.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1995-12-15· cited 11×
• State v. Hoch
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2011-01-14· cited 5×
• In Re CK
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1995-12-15
• State v. Cloutier
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-12-15

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Zaccaro
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-03-09· cited 63×
• In re M.B.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1992-01-17· cited 31×
• State v. Duffy
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1992-03-06· cited 8×