Illinois Supreme Court· 9/18/2003

People v. Lampitok

Citations

798 N.E.2d 91
207 Ill. 2d 231
278 Ill. Dec. 244

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that an officer’s subjective belief that he has sufficient suspicion to justify the intrusion is inadequate to satisfy the objective reasonable suspicion standard
finding that the warrantless search of a probationer’s motel room would be constitutional if the police had reasonable suspicion of a probation violation
balancing private and governmental interests, holding that probationer has a reduced expectation of privacy compared to ordinary citizens
applying the special needs test where, during a warrantless search of the probationer’s motel room, police found items the probationer was barred from possessing under the terms of her probation order
imposing a reasonable suspicion requirement on probation officers even where probation agreement contained no such requirement
imposing a reasonable suspicion requirement on probation officers even where probation agreement contained no such requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Lampitok

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.