People v. Lampitok

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an officer’s subjective belief that he has sufficient suspicion to justify the intrusion is inadequate to satisfy the objective reasonable suspicion standard
• finding that the warrantless search of a probationer’s motel room would be constitutional if the police had reasonable suspicion of a probation violation
• balancing private and governmental interests, holding that probationer has a reduced expectation of privacy compared to ordinary citizens
• applying the special needs test where, during a warrantless search of the probationer’s motel room, police found items the probationer was barred from possessing under the terms of her probation order
• imposing a reasonable suspicion requirement on probation officers even where probation agreement contained no such requirement
• imposing a reasonable suspicion requirement on probation officers even where probation agreement contained no such requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).