State v. Vinyard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding separate businesses in a shopping mall are separate buildings
• without directly addressing the authority issue, court affirmed conviction for aggravated burglary when the defendant reentered a Dillard’s store after being instructed not to return on prior occasions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Storey
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2008-04-04· cited 70×
• State v. Acevedo
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2013-11-22· cited 25×
• State v. Parker
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2012-08-10· cited 16×
• State v. Hill
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-09-13· cited 14×
• State v. Castillo
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2005-07-22· cited 5×
• State v. Glover
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2019-06-07· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Maass
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2003-03-07· cited 115×
• State v. Jamison
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2000-07-14· cited 101×
• State v. Hill
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2001-07-20· cited 66×
• Hawkinson v. Bennett
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1998-07-10· cited 65×
• State v. McCorgary
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1978-10-28· cited 50×
• State v. Evans
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2001-01-26· cited 38×
• State v. Lane
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1997-05-30· cited 33×
• State v. Hall
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2000-12-08· cited 18×
• State v. HALL, JR.
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-04-07· cited 10×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-02-09· cited 6×