State v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “exception to mootness doctrine exists with respect to the questions of a public nature which present a likelihood of recurrence thereby suggesting the desirability of an authoritative adjudication”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hernandez-Lopez
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2002-01-24· cited 161×
• State v. Kase
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1983-10-19· cited 5×
• Hubble v. Bi-State Development Agency of the Illinois-Missouri Metropolitan District
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2010-09-23

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hamilton v. City of Urbandale
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1980-04-23· cited 39×
• Women Aware v. Reagen
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1983-03-16· cited 25×
• State Ex Rel. Turner v. Buechele
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1975-12-17· cited 24×
• Ogden v. Klundt
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1976-05-18· cited 9×
• Ex Parte Cantrell
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1962-11-21· cited 6×
• Ex parte Womack
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-05-20· cited 3×