Hamilton v. City of Urbandale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that phrase “[t]he rehabilitation and improvement of parks already owned, including the removal, replacement and planting of trees thereon” did not contemplate activities such as construction of a $250,000 athletic complex
• whether city could issue $250,000 in general obligation bonds for softball fields without special election was “of substantial public interest and may likely recur in the future”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).