State v. Duren

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[The police officers] already had [the defendant] in custody and . . . acting on [the private citizen’s] behalf, advised [the defendant] of the reasons upon which [the private citizen] had based his arrest, indicative of compliance with the statutory requirements outlined.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Douglas Edward Rambo
  Eighth Circuit· 1986-04-25· cited 133×
• Rife v. D.T. Corner, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2002-02-27· cited 44×
• John Hugh Gilmore v. City of Minneapolis
  Eighth Circuit· 2016-09-13· cited 42×
• State v. Hicks
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-10-11· cited 24×
• Kinna v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1968-11-13· cited 23×
• United States v. Norman Lyle Prouse, United States of America v. Robert John Kirchner, United States of America v. Joseph Wesley Balzer
  Eighth Circuit· 1991-10-31· cited 16×
• State v. Quinnell
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-06-09· cited 13×
• State v. Armstrong
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-02-04· cited 5×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Coverstone v. Davies
  California Supreme Court· 1952-01-25· cited 162×
• State v. Pluth
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1923-11-16· cited 54×
• Smith v. Hubbard
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1958-07-18· cited 53×
• Roberson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1901-01-15· cited 33×
• People v. Burgess
  California Court of Appeal· 1959-04-29· cited 25×
• Mock v. Davies
  Supreme Court· 1952-10-13· cited 17×
• State v. Gulczynski
  New York Court of General Session of the Peace· 1922-09-29· cited 13×
• Hilla v. Jensen
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1921-05-06· cited 7×
• State v. Murphy
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1926-11-16· cited 6×