Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1/30/2013

State v. Wesley

Citations

254 Or. App. 697
295 P.3d 1147
2013 WL 356723
2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 109

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

indicating that the legislature controls the scope of the state’s felony murder statute
applying the Lawson / James framework in an appeal challenging the trial court’s order denying the defendant’s pretrial motion to exclude eyewitness identification evidence that was decided by the trial court under Classen
“ ‘If one shoots at A and misses him, but kills B, this is murder; because of the previous felonious intent, which the law transfers from one to the other.’ ” (quoting 4 WILLIAM BLACKSTONE, COMMENTARIES )
witness’s reli- ability undermined by the fact that he “had used metham- phetamine the night before the shooting, although no evi- dence was presented as to what effect that might have had on his ability to perceive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Brewer, Sercombe, Tempore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.