State v. Hickman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s presence at the scene of the transaction, paired with his comments about the high quality of the marijuana being sold by his friend, constituted aiding and abetting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Giles v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1994-05-20· cited 67×
• State v. Gonzalez
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2000-08-16· cited 20×
• State v. Medina
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1996-04-19· cited 18×
• State v. Bettwieser
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2006-09-07· cited 14×
• State v. Mitchell
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2008-08-18· cited 10×
• State v. Maland
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1993-10-01· cited 10×
• State v. Geirrod Detloph Stark
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2013-04-04· cited 9×
• State v. Olson
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1991-03-01· cited 2×
• Tellez-Ramirez v. Garland
  Ninth Circuit· 2023-11-29· cited 2×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Tucker
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1975-07-22· cited 109×
• State v. Tanner
  Utah Supreme Court· 1983-11-15· cited 67×
• State v. Randles
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1990-01-16· cited 44×
• State v. Koch
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1989-08-02· cited 30×
• State v. Duncan
  Montana Supreme Court· 1979-04-19· cited 29×
• Howard v. Felton
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1963-02-18· cited 29×
• State v. Rendon
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1984-10-19· cited 15×
• State v. Sujohn
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1985-03-27· cited 12×
• State v. Boag
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1990-11-29· cited 11×
• Roles v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1979-12-18· cited 9×
• State v. Scroggie
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1986-01-30· cited 8×