Montana Supreme Court· 4/19/1979
State v. Duncan
Citations
- 593 P.2d 1026
- 181 Mont. 382
- 1979 Mont. LEXIS 682
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing criticism of the requirement and the language used by the United States Supreme Court in Forman which “effectively deletes the strict ‘solely’ requirement from the test.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sheehy, Daly, Shea, Haswell, Harrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BrewerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1996-02-13· cited 360×
- Thiel v. TAURUS DRILLING LTD. 1980-IIMontana Supreme Court· 1985-12-23· cited 48×
- Mathews v. Cassidy Turley Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-11-26· cited 47×
- State v. BoyerMontana Supreme Court· 1985-02-21· cited 43×
- State v. GattsMontana Supreme Court· 1996-11-01· cited 32×
- State v. RodriguezMontana Supreme Court· 1981-04-19· cited 29×
- State v. CopeMontana Supreme Court· 1991-10-29· cited 27×
- Redding v. Montana First Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court· 2012-07-06· cited 27×
- Gaudina v. HabermanWyoming Supreme Court· 1982-04-16· cited 16×
- State v. HickmanIdaho Court of Appeals· 1991-02-28· cited 12×
- Mosley v. American Express Financial Advisors, Inc.Montana Supreme Court· 2010-04-13· cited 10×
- State v. ShurtliffMontana Supreme Court· 1981-11-05· cited 8×
- State v. PriceMontana Supreme Court· 1980-12-17· cited 7×
- Christgard, Inc. v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-04-20· cited 5×
- Probst v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1991-03-05· cited 4×
- State v. DuncanMontana Supreme Court· 1981-02-11· cited 4×
- Securities Administrator v. College Assistance Plan (Guam) Inc.D. Guam· 1981-12-22· cited 3×
- Redding v. ProSight Specialty Management Co.D. Montana· 2015-02-27· cited 1×
- Thiel v. Taurus Drilling Limited 19Montana Supreme Court· 1985-10-08
- City of Helena v. HofstetterMontana Supreme Court· 2015-11-17
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 1,862×
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,779×
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court· 1946-10-14· cited 1,616×
- United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 908×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,748 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Glenn W. Turner Enterprises, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1973-02-01· cited 399×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,710 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1974-07-15· cited 213×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,468 Ernest C. Hector v. Herman Wiens, Individually and Dba Wiens Feed LotNinth Circuit· 1976-02-23· cited 183×
- Silver Hills Country Club v. SobieskiCalifornia Supreme Court· 1961-05-18· cited 98×
- People v. DempsterMichigan Supreme Court· 1976-06-03· cited 93×
- State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Securities v. Hawaii Market Center, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court· 1971-05-20· cited 73×
- Searsy v. Commercial Trading Corp.Texas Supreme Court· 1977-12-30· cited 54×
- State v. StoddardMontana Supreme Court· 1966-04-01· cited 52×
- State v. WhiteMontana Supreme Court· 1965-08-27· cited 52×
- People v. BlairSupreme Court of Colorado· 1978-06-05· cited 45×
- State v. PascgoMontana Supreme Court· 1977-07-20· cited 38×
- State v. Medicine BullMontana Supreme Court· 1968-10-18· cited 34×
- State v. HodgeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1969-11-08· cited 33×
- State Ex Rel. Healy v. Consumer Business System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1971-03-11· cited 31×
- Pratt v. KrossOregon Supreme Court· 1976-10-21· cited 28×
- H. Earl Clack Co. v. Public Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court· 1933-06-19· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.