State v. Hendrix
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 3754
Syllabus
POSTCONVICTION—APPELLATE REVIEW/CRIMINAL: Petitioner's postconviction ineffective-counsel claim was not barred under the doctrine of res judicata, because it depended for its resolution upon evidence outside the trial record. The court of appeals must presume the regularity of, and thus affirm, the common pleas court's judgment dismissing petitioner's postconviction petition without a hearing, when in the absence of the defense exhibits, the record on appeal did not include a complete transcript of the proceedings necessary to the resolution of the challenge advanced on appeal.
Judges: Deters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
- Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court· 1980-02-13· cited 2,064×
- Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1988-03-23· cited 956×
- State v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court· 1980-12-17· cited 791×
- State v. PankeyOhio Supreme Court· 1981-11-18· cited 106×
- State v. HendrixOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-04-27· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.