State v. Hendrix

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[C]onduct is competent evidence from which a jury may reasonably infer intent * * *.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Plowman
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-08-27· cited 123×
• People v. Joshua H.
  California Court of Appeal· 1993-03-08· cited 27×
• State v. Meyer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-05-19· cited 25×
• State v. Hendrix
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-08-27· cited 4×
• State v. Plowman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-06-19· cited 2×
• State v. Frost
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-05-29· cited 1×
• State v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-10-30

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1982-03-03· cited 3,694×
• Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
  Supreme Court· 1942-03-09· cited 2,706×
• Texas v. Johnson
  Supreme Court· 1989-06-21· cited 1,671×
• Lanzetta v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 1939-03-27· cited 1,416×
• State v. Brown
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-09-20· cited 504×
• State v. Robertson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-08-03· cited 334×
• United States v. Eichman
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 216×
• State v. King
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-01-31· cited 170×
• State v. Montez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-04-03· cited 170×
• State v. Hodges
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1969-07-24· cited 139×
• State v. Harris
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1980-03-25· cited 82×
• State v. Graves
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1985-05-29· cited 79×
• State v. Cantwell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-02-08· cited 35×
• State v. Walker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1966-09-09· cited 25×
• State v. Harrington
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-04-11· cited 16×
• State v. Beebe
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-04-18· cited 5×