State v. Heckathorne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing distinction between whether a container “announces its contents” and whether police had probable cause to believe a container holds contraband
• Article I, section 9, protects both possessory and privacy interests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Heckathorne
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-12-31· cited 16×
• State v. Luman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-06-25· cited 8×
• State v. Bellar
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-09-30· cited 5×
• State v. Dodge
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-15· cited 2×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Katz v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
• State v. Owens
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-11-20· cited 434×
• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-06-29· cited 279×
• State v. Ready
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-05-28· cited 46×
• State v. Kruchek
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-10-28· cited 28×
• State v. Lane
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-06-28· cited 19×
• State v. Dickerson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-06-21· cited 14×
• State v. Russell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-03-17· cited 14×
• State v. Fugate
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-12-20· cited 12×
• State v. Stock
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-11-01· cited 8×
• State v. Walker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-03-14· cited 7×
• State v. Gohring
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-01-03· cited 6×
• State v. English
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-12-29· cited 6×