Court of Appeals of Oregon· 11/1/2006
State v. Stock
Citations
- 146 P.3d 393
- 209 Or. App. 7
- 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1677
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing distinction between containers that announce their contents and those that provide probable cause
- Whether a container announces its contents is an inquiry “independent of * * * the subjective knowledge and experience of the officer who found it.”
- probable cause for arrest as objectively reasonable on discovery of bottle cap bent around a small plastic bag; container found next to drug paraphernalia and car was driven in suspicious manner in drug activity area
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Brewer, Ortega
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. FugateCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-12-20· cited 12×
- State v. LumanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-06-25· cited 8×
- State v. HiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-11-05· cited 7×
- State v. HeckathorneCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-02-27· cited 5×
- State v. Wise-WelshCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-02· cited 5×
- State v. DodgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-15· cited 2×
- State v. EdmistonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-07-01
- State v. Garcia-CruzCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-08-30
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.