Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/12/2018
State v. Brown
Citations
- 430 P.3d 160
- 294 Or. App. 61
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a police officer was not qualified to opine that a person who has nystagmus as a result of a brain injury will not exhibit all six clues on the HGN test
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Egan, Hadlock, Tookey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-27· cited 9×
- State v. Rodriguez-DelaoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-10-30· cited 4×
- State v. WendtCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-10-31· cited 2×
- State v. ThrelkeldCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-09-09· cited 1×
- Johnson v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-07-10
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
- State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court· 2000-05-04· cited 302×
- State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court· 1995-07-07· cited 243×
- State Highway Commission v. ArnoldOregon Supreme Court· 1959-07-01· cited 45×
- State v. HenleyOregon Supreme Court· 2018-07-19· cited 43×
- State v. DunningCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-09-21· cited 10×
- State v. OhottoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-02-12· cited 10×
- Mall v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-06-06· cited 9×
- State v. AlthofCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-08-26· cited 6×
- State v. HazlettCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-04· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.