State v. Haynik
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1363
Syllabus
App.R. 26(B) application for reopening; App.R. 26(B)(2)(b) 90-day period to file timely application; untimely filed; failure to establish good cause for untimely filing of application; good cause not applied for an indefinite period of time. The applicant has filed an App.R. 26(B) application for reopening beyond the 90-day period for filing a timely application per App.R. 26(B)(2)(b). The applicant has failed to establish good cause for the untimely filing of the application for reopening.
Judges: Sheehan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court· 1982-03-02· cited 2,744×
- State v. ReddickOhio Supreme Court· 1995-04-26· cited 212×
- State v. CooeyOhio Supreme Court· 1995-08-30· cited 117×
- State v. WinsteadOhio Supreme Court· 1996-01-10· cited 106×
- State v. FoxOhio Supreme Court· 1998-11-10· cited 47×
- State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court· 1999-08-25· cited 36×
- State v. HillOhio Supreme Court· 1997-04-16· cited 18×
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court· 1994-11-09· cited 12×
- State v. PruittOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-01-11· cited 7×
- State v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-28· cited 7×
- State v. BlackOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-10· cited 6×
- State v. WilcoxOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-07-01· cited 5×
- State v. HowellOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-07-25· cited 4×
- State v. McCornellOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-15· cited 3×
- State v. JeffriesOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-16· cited 3×
- State v. HaynikOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-09· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.