Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/16/2019

State v. Jeffries

Citations

2019 Ohio 4255

Syllabus

App.R. 26(B) application to reopen, Sixth Amendment right to confrontation, timeliness, good cause, reliance on counsel, lack of transcript, and genuine issue regarding ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. The court denied the App.R. 26(B) application to reopen as untimely. Reliance on counsel, lack of transcript, and genuine issue regarding ineffective assistance of appellate counsel do not provide good cause for untimely filing.

Judges: Mays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Houston
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-17· cited 1×
State v. Haynik
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-14· cited 1×
State v. Jeffries
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-05-15· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Crawford v. Washington
Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
State v. Murnahan
Ohio Supreme Court· 1992-02-19· cited 753×
State v. Gumm
Ohio Supreme Court· 2004-09-22· cited 197×
State v. LaMar
Ohio Supreme Court· 2004-08-11· cited 173×
Drexel Greene v. Anthony J. Brigano, Warden
Sixth Circuit· 1997-08-22· cited 13×
State v. Alt
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-05-09· cited 12×
State v. Wilcox
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-07-01· cited 5×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.