State v. Campbell
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 3494
Syllabus
App.R. 26(B) application for reopening, untimely filed, failure to establish good cause for untimely filing. The applicant did not timely file an App.R. 26(B) application for reopening. The applicant has not established good cause for the untimely filing of the application for reopening as based upon the failure of a mail delivery system to timely deliver the application to the clerk of the appellate court. Notwithstanding the failure to establish good cause, a substantive review of the proposed assignments of error raised by the applicant fails to establish the claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.
Judges: Mays
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BlackOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-10· cited 6×
- State v. DudasOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-07· cited 1×
- State v. HaynikOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-14· cited 1×
- State v. PrestonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-30
- State v. DudasOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-19
- State v. BurksOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-05
- State v. FrettOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-07-18
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court· 1982-03-02· cited 2,744×
- State v. ReddickOhio Supreme Court· 1995-04-26· cited 212×
- State v. GummOhio Supreme Court· 2004-09-22· cited 197×
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court· 2004-08-11· cited 173×
- State v. CooeyOhio Supreme Court· 1995-08-30· cited 117×
- State v. WinsteadOhio Supreme Court· 1996-01-10· cited 106×
- State v. GlazeOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-06-07· cited 6×
- State v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-02-22· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.