State v. Haynesworth
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 1817
Syllabus
Motion to vacate void judgment res judicata. The trial court did not err or abuse its discretion in dismissing the appellant's motion to vacate a void judgment and sentence without an evidentiary hearing. The trial court has the discretion to hold an evidentiary hearing. The appellant's claims were barred by res judicata. Additionally, the appellant pleaded guilty, and therefore, waived his right to challenge sufficiency of the evidence.
Judges: Laster Mays
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 1,479×
- Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court· 1995-08-30· cited 1,323×
- State v. ReynoldsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 802×
- State v. GondorOhio Supreme Court· 2006-12-26· cited 691×
- State v. SteffenOhio Supreme Court· 1994-09-28· cited 454×
- State v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court· 2008-04-09· cited 92×
- State ex rel. Madsen v. JonesOhio Supreme Court· 2005-09-07· cited 25×
- State v. CurryOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-26· cited 16×
- State v. PatrickOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-14· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.