Skip to main content

State v. Hawkins

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 452

Syllabus

GSI App.R. 21 supplemental authority Evid.R. 611 leading questions Evid.R. 802 hearsay Evid.R. 803 exceptions to hearsay medical treatment or diagnosis. Affirmed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting the prosecutor limited latitude in questioning a young victim through the use of leading questions eliciting the victim's out-of-court statements to another person and by permitting a social worker to testify as to the victim's statements made for the purposes of medical treatment or diagnosis.

Judges: S. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.