Skip to main content

State v. Hawkins

Citations

  • 201 P.3d 239
  • 225 Or. App. 355
  • 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 41

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no attenuation where evidence was gained in the course of unlawful stop and no evidence was presented about whether the defendant’s statements were volunteered or prompted by questioning
  • statements derive from unlawful conduct if made during an unlawful seizure
  • where there was a minimal factual connection between the unlawful stop and the evidence sought to be suppressed, the state had the burden to establish that the evidence would have been obtained independently or that the connection between the seizure and the evidence was attenuated
  • “When officers execute a search warrant and have reason to believe that at least some of the persons present are armed and dangerous, officer safety concerns permit officers to handcuff and detain all persons who are present, even persons not named in the warrant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brewer, Ortega, Carson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.