State v. Hatfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the existence of a conspiracy does not require a formal agreement and may be inferred from the evidence
• stating that agreement to conspire “must be shown by evidence that objectively indicates an agreement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Clark
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-08-28· cited 55×
• State v. Stein
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-01-07· cited 48×
• State v. Caine
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-03-27· cited 47×
• State v. Asfeld
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-06-12· cited 30×
• State v. Vereb
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-05-07· cited 15×
• State v. Tice
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-09-14· cited 8×
• State v. Tracy
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2003-08-08· cited 7×
• State v. Perry
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-01-09· cited 5×
• State v. Longo
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2018-03-26
• State of Minnesota v. Donald James Miller
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-06-17

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Falcone
  Supreme Court· 1940-12-09· cited 436×
• State v. Wahlberg
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-08-08· cited 202×
• State v. Walen
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-05-29· cited 51×
• State v. Steinbuch
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-04-08· cited 38×
• State v. St. Christopher
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-08-29· cited 29×
• State v. Hatfield
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-06-05· cited 3×