State v. Wilson

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 392

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling appellant's motion for leave to file a motion for a new trial. The documents submitted in support of his motion for leave did not demonstrate that he had been unavoidably prevented from discovering the evidence on which he relied in the many years since his conviction. Appellant also was not entitled to a hearing on his motion. Judgment affirmed.