Wisconsin Supreme Court· 4/30/1985
State v. Hartwig
Citations
- 366 N.W.2d 866
- 123 Wis. 2d 278
- 1985 Wisc. LEXIS 2207
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reviewing whether defendant's Fifth Amendment right to silence had been scrupulously honored
- reviewing whether defendant's Fifth Amendment right to silence had been scrupulously honored
- where police failed scrupulously to honor defendant’s right to cut off questioning, subsequent confession obtained after ninety-minute wait, fresh warnings, and written waiver was tainted by earlier violation
- where police failed scrupulously to honor defendant's right to cut off questioning, subsequent confession obtained after ninety-minute wait, fresh warnings, and written waiver was tainted by earlier violation
- failure scrupulously to honor right to silence was coercive and tainted confession
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Day
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BeySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1988-08-02· cited 242×
- State v. PhillipsWisconsin Supreme Court· 1998-05-22· cited 161×
- Bruce Nelson, P-8315 v. Thomas A. Fulcomer Appeal of Bruce NelsonThird Circuit· 1990-08-17· cited 38×
- State v. PettitNebraska Supreme Court· 1987-12-18· cited 31×
- State v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1986-11-20· cited 23×
- State v. LaurieSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-04-16· cited 17×
- State v. HasselCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2005-03-15· cited 9×
- State v. McNeilWisconsin Supreme Court· 1990-05-02· cited 8×
- State v. HopsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2004-07-07
- State v. CurleeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2004-12-28
- Johnnie Wesley v. Randall HeppSeventh Circuit· 2024-01-05
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.