State v. Harris
Citations
- 198 Conn. App. 530
Syllabus
Convicted, following a jury trial, of the crimes of murder, robbery in the first degree, and carrying a pistol without a permit, the defendant appealed. Held: 1. The defendant could not prevail on his claim that the trial court improperly admitted uncharged misconduct evidence regarding two robberies and three shootings: the defendant failed to preserve his claim that the trial court improperly admitted evidence of uncharged misconduct, the defendant's objections lacked specificity with regard to the two robber- ies and the record did not reveal any objections to the admission of evidence regarding the shootings; moreover, the defendant was not entitled to reversal of his conviction under the plain error doctrine on his unpreserved claim that the trial court improperly admitted evidence of three uncharged shootings as it was clear from the record that the court balanced the probative value of the evidence against its prejudicial effect, and its determination that the evidence was more probative than prejudicial was legally correct; furthermore, even assuming, arguendo, that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting the evidence of the uncharged shootings, the defendant could not prove that the abuse of discretion was harmful in light of the trial court's ameliorative steps, which included limiting instructions to the jury regarding its use of uncharged misconduct evidence. 2. The defendant could not prevail on his claim that prosecutorial impropriety deprived him of his due process right to a fair trial; the prosecutor's comments about the defendant's gang affiliation and her misstatement about the location where the defendant confessed to an individual about the murder did not constitute prosecutorial impropriety and, although, the prosecutor's use of the defendant's nickname beyond the purpose of clarifying the responses of the witnesses was arguably improper, the defendant was not deprived of a fair trial by the prosecutor's use of his nickname, given th
Judges: Lavine; Alvord; Harper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-28· cited 498×
- State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-06-15· cited 228×
- State v. FauciSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-04-10· cited 161×
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-01-24· cited 153×
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-10-28· cited 147×
- State v. MooneySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-03-19· cited 145×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-12-31· cited 88×
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 62×
- State v. LongSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-08-11· cited 57×
- State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-06-22· cited 52×
- State v. DewsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-01-25· cited 31×
- State v. Roger B.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-07-27· cited 30×
- Elsey v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-01-18· cited 30×
- State v. SivriConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-09-09· cited 25×
- Daley v. McClintockSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-01-20· cited 24×
- State v. DucharmeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-05-23· cited 22×
- Walker v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-09-04· cited 21×
- State v. BlangoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-08-07· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.