Skip to main content

State v. Harris

Citations

  • 490 N.W.2d 561
  • 1992 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 374
  • 1992 WL 296127

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that probable cause requires “reasonable ground[s] for belief’ that the person to be arrested has committed a crime
  • stating that the odor of alcohol on the defendant’s breath and bloodshot, watery eyes is sufficient to support a finding of probable cause in a drunk driving context (citing State v. Harlan, 301 N.W.2d 717, 720 (Iowa 1981))
  • noting “the public intoxication statute, contained within a chapter entitled the ‘Iowa Alcoholic Beverage Control Act,’ makes no reference to intoxication by any other controlled substances”
  • noting “the public intoxication statute, contained within a chapter entitled the ‘Iowa Alcoholic Beverage Control Act,’ makes no reference to intoxication by any other controlled substances”
  • “All of the evidence available to the arresting officer may be considered, regardless of whether or not each component would support a finding of probable cause by itself.”
  • “The officer described the physical symptoms that signaled [the defendant’s] intoxication by alcohol: the smell of alcohol on his breath and his bloodshot, watery eyes. We have found such evidence (combined with proof of driving

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larson, Layorato, McGIVERIN, Neuman, Snell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.