Supreme Court of South Carolina· 10/14/2002

State v. Harris

Citations

572 S.E.2d 267
351 S.C. 643
2002 S.C. LEXIS 265

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding a motion to sever issue was not preserved because the defendant did not base his initial motion upon the issue raised on appeal
holding an argument not made at trial is not preserved for appeal
listing four considerations for a trial court in deciding whether to try separate crimes in a joint trial
stating if there is any direct or substantial circumstantial evidence reasonably tending to prove the guilt of the accused, an appellate court must find the case was properly submitted to the jury
stating if there is any direct or substantial circumstantial evidence reasonably tending to prove the guilt of the accused, an appellate court must find the case was properly submitted to the jury
If there is any direct evidence or any substantial circumstantial evidence reasonably tending to prove the guilt of the accused, an appellate court must find that the case was properly submitted to the jury.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waller, Moore, Burnett, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.